Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Fri, 10/05/2018 - 03:06
Recently an atheist has written that if there is a god and if this god affects our reality, then he would be a part of nature. So we will be able to measure the effects of this god in our reality, even if we cannot understand them. But until now we have not measured anything attributable to such a god.
But it is definitely not true that we have not measured anything attributable to such a god. So I have to present my argument to him as to why I think his contention regarding this is not true. Below it is:
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Sun, 03/18/2018 - 11:07
The cause that makes space and time to be relative in our universe must lie outside our universe. Otherwise we will have to admit that there was a time when they were not relative, but absolute.
We know that space and time are relative in our universe. But what is the cause that makes them to be relative? Let us say that A is the cause that makes space and time relative. Now regarding A there are two possibilities here:
1) This cause lies within space and time; and
2) it lies outside space and time.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Mon, 11/09/2015 - 01:37
In a debate between Dr. William Lane Craig and Quentin Smith on March 22, 1996 Dr. Craig has thus given a theistic notion of God in his opening arguments: "a personal Creator, uncaused, beginningless, changeless, immaterial, timeless, spaceless, enormously powerful, and intelligent."
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Sun, 01/27/2013 - 07:05
The cause that makes space and time to be relative in our universe must lie outside our universe. Otherwise we will have to admit that there was a time when they were not relative, but absolute.
Recent comments