Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Sun, 07/31/2016 - 01:36
In an earlier article1 I have written that God cannot be defined, but that God’s attributes can only be described. And the complete description of this God is this: God is spaceless, timeless, changeless, immortal, all-pervading, one, unborn, uncreated, without any beginning, without an end, everlasting, non-composite and immaterial.
Here I will show that the existence of anything will ultimately point to this God.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Mon, 07/25/2016 - 03:15
Recently I put the following question to an atheist:
‘Can you name a single thing in nature that has the property of hardness, but that is not hard itself?’
His reply was this:
‘That doesn’t make sense.’
Then again I wrote to him:
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Thu, 07/14/2016 - 11:28
Atheists sometimes object that there is no clear definition of a god/God. Here I want to say very clearly that God cannot be defined, God's attributes can only be described. If God is the creator of the universe, then from this it follows that before creation God was alone and that there was no one else, nothing else other than God. As universe means space, time, matter and energy, so from this it follows that before creation there was no space, no time, no matter and no energy.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Mon, 07/11/2016 - 05:14
There is good reason to believe that something or someone exists beyond space-time. Whatever exists within space-time is contingent upon space-time for its existence; if space-time is gone, then everything within space-time will also be gone. So it cannot acquire any property or characteristic from space-time itself or from anything within space-time that will make space-time itself non-existent, because by that process it will cause its own demise. This is simple common sense. Our existence is contingent upon the existence of earth; so if we destroy the earth, we will also be destroyed.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Fri, 07/01/2016 - 09:30
When some scientists have given an explanation for the origin of the universe due to quantum energy fluctuation in a void, was it that their sole purpose was just to show how the universe had actually originated? No, they were having one more open agenda and some scientists are still very much vocal about it: they want to send a message to all sorts of superstitious believers all over the world, so that they can forever arise from their dogmatic slumber, that this universe does not need any kind of God in any way.
Pages
Recent comments