Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Fri, 09/07/2018 - 00:28
"If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him." – Voltaire
"A Boss in Heaven is the best excuse for a boss on earth; therefore if God did exist, he would have to be abolished.” - Mikhail Bakunin
God cannot be so easily abolished, because even an atheist is now seeing god where there is no mention of god. Below is the story:
Athiest1
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Tue, 07/31/2018 - 02:56
In one YouTube presentation the question discussed was whether Atheism was Impervious to Evidence. The following thread is from that presentation.
Atheist1
No, atheism is not impervious to evidence. All you have to do is provide evidence for a god, to date nobody has done that, not even once. There has never been any testable, falsifiable, repeatable, demonstrable, concrete, independently verifiable evidence presented for any deity ever.
Me to Atheist1
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Wed, 06/14/2017 - 01:34
In one YouTube comment thread an atheist has asked this question: 'Which god? I like Zeus... Can I study his word as the one and only truth? Odds are he's as right as Yahweh is or Allah or Odin or Shiva or Osiris or... You get the point'
So the most crucial question is: which god? Because there are thousands of gods which man has imagined so far. Out of so many gods, which one is the true god?
Actually there can be only one true God, a God who has created the universe. The answer is as simple as that.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Sun, 04/02/2017 - 09:15
In an earlier article1 I have shown how an atheist tries to suppress his opponent’s voice. Recently I have come across another instance of this.
In one YouTube video comment section one person has written that theists are hilarious because they demand evidence for a multiverse, although they cannot provide any evidence for their God. He has also written that at least multiverse has intensely strong mathematical support behind it.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Sun, 12/25/2016 - 10:50
Atheists do have some deep basic convictions. When science does in no way contradict these basic convictions of them, they are whole-heartedly with science. However if any scientific theory contradicts in any way any single basic conviction of them, they do not hesitate to go against science.
The two most basic convictions of the atheists are:
• There is nothing supernatural; and
• Whatever exists, exists within space-time only. So nothing can exist outside space-time.
Pages
Recent comments